Risk-Driven Model

  1. Is there a flexible and adaptable approach for testing any software? How to establish realistic testing goals?
  2. On a grand scale, would a risk-driven model discourage creativity in software design, since the entire premise of the model is to averse risks? In another way, is risk always bad?
  3. What are the differences between analytic vs. analogic models?
  4. How much design and architecture is generally considered sufficient?
  5. How should you determine which risks pass the manageable threshold and which do not?
  6. When is it important for your process to be repeatable?
  7. How would you completely eliminate engineering risk?
  8. If there is a risk that can’t be controlled at the moment, is it okay to be left until it is possible to be dealt with?
  9. What are examples of risks that can be ignored in the preliminary stages of software development?
  10. Is there a preset solution for looking at certain risks?
  11. Is it at all possible to determine when to stop looking at risks and publish the system?
  12. Under what circumstances Risk-Driven Model is not the best choice?
  13. What is risk which process model is used to develop software product when risk is involved?
  14. What do you do if there aren’t any established techniques to solve a given problem?
  15. How do you prioritize risks that could all be catastrophic and all have the same probability of occurring?
Scroll to Top